>Subject: Re: Just for the recordFrom: GR gragain@earthlink.netDate: 10/30/2003 3:31 PM Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <tsr2qvkig4l72cbkofq31fa9d9itjbl5fg@4ax.com>On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 03:08:48 -0000, "helicon" <helicon@eircom.net>wrote:

< snip >
Ahhh.... then they treated *you* much differently than Jackieis being treated.

I wonder why.
They *are* personally spiteful to her and stuff *is*constantly being thrown back in her face.

Well, when she argues that "adoption is a form of slavery" crapola, damn
straight she's gonna get return fire from me.
Get it?

I think so.

Dad

On 30 Oct 2003 20:43:10 GMT, adoptadad@aol.com (AdoptaDad) wrote:

<snip>
Well, when she argues that "adoption is a form of slavery" crapola, damnstraight she's gonna get return fire from me.

Well, adoptadude, if a human being is being sold in return for
cash/services/goods then the transaction has met a major required
burden in demonstrating the slavery of the bought/sold individual.
That required element is present in some adoptions, and there's no
getting around it.

That most adoption situations depart slavery comparison after that
(except in the erased identity area) is equally clear. Jackie knows
that, I know that, other people know that. Wanna fight about it?
Get it? I think so.

I dunno.

GR