wliao.geo
07-27-2003, 02:42 PM
In 1991, a Chinese MA student at the University of Toronto, Canada
disagreed a professor, Waterhouse's art history theory that "the
concept of beauty" is a "European concept" and Asians did not have the
concept in history. Faced with the evidence submitted by the student,
Waterhouse admitted the student's findings that the concept of beauty
is universal for all human beings. Meanwhile, he conspired a reprisal
harassment against the student that consisted of a series of knowing
violations of the University's grading system and academic
regulations that directly caused the failure of the student's
application for a Ph.D program.
The student filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission
(OHRC). The OHRC colluded together with the University to cover up the
crucial evidences and investigation results on Waterhouse's knowing
violations, and with the collusion of a American professor James
Cahill of the University of California at Berkeley, concluded that the
Student's dispute with Waterhouse was unfounded without providing any
justifiable ground. The complaint was dismissed.
In order to further oppress the student's pursuit of the human rights
complaint, the OHRC and the University engaged in a conspiracy to
initiate a criminal proceeding against the student by a malicious
entrapment - giving an unconditional "confidentiality guaranty" to
deceive the student into a complete trust on the OHRC, then asking
incriminating questions, and then prosecuting the student for her
reply. During this prosecution, the OHRC and U of T parties committed
perjury, fabricating evidence and deceit, etc. The student was finally
found guilty by a judge for an obviously unlawful and illogic reason.
This criminal prosecution has infringed on the student's following
rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
(1). Right against self-incrimination guaranteed by s. of the charter
in that the prosecution violated the "voluntary commission rule" of
criminal proceedings;
(2). Right against arbitrary detention guaranteed by s. 9 of the
Charter in that the police conducted an unlawful arrest of the
student;
(3). Right to equality before and under the law guaranteed by s. 15 of
the Charter, in that the prosecution failed to prosecute the crime of
perjury and fabricating evidence against the student during the
proceeding; and the "bail condition" imposed by the prosecution on the
student violated the Ontario Human Rights Code;
(4). Right to freedom and liberty guaranteed by s. 7 of the Charter by
this criminal prosecution that was politically motivated to interfere
with the student's human rights case.
Now the courts both in California, USA, and in Canada are actively
engaging themselves in the oppression of my law suits against the
perpetrators of my human rights case. It is the best evidence for
American and Canada's hypocrisy in their propaganda on "human rights
cause" - they only use it as a political weapon against other nations.
For the story, please visit
http://www.geocities.com/wliao.geo/
disagreed a professor, Waterhouse's art history theory that "the
concept of beauty" is a "European concept" and Asians did not have the
concept in history. Faced with the evidence submitted by the student,
Waterhouse admitted the student's findings that the concept of beauty
is universal for all human beings. Meanwhile, he conspired a reprisal
harassment against the student that consisted of a series of knowing
violations of the University's grading system and academic
regulations that directly caused the failure of the student's
application for a Ph.D program.
The student filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission
(OHRC). The OHRC colluded together with the University to cover up the
crucial evidences and investigation results on Waterhouse's knowing
violations, and with the collusion of a American professor James
Cahill of the University of California at Berkeley, concluded that the
Student's dispute with Waterhouse was unfounded without providing any
justifiable ground. The complaint was dismissed.
In order to further oppress the student's pursuit of the human rights
complaint, the OHRC and the University engaged in a conspiracy to
initiate a criminal proceeding against the student by a malicious
entrapment - giving an unconditional "confidentiality guaranty" to
deceive the student into a complete trust on the OHRC, then asking
incriminating questions, and then prosecuting the student for her
reply. During this prosecution, the OHRC and U of T parties committed
perjury, fabricating evidence and deceit, etc. The student was finally
found guilty by a judge for an obviously unlawful and illogic reason.
This criminal prosecution has infringed on the student's following
rights guaranteed by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
(1). Right against self-incrimination guaranteed by s. of the charter
in that the prosecution violated the "voluntary commission rule" of
criminal proceedings;
(2). Right against arbitrary detention guaranteed by s. 9 of the
Charter in that the police conducted an unlawful arrest of the
student;
(3). Right to equality before and under the law guaranteed by s. 15 of
the Charter, in that the prosecution failed to prosecute the crime of
perjury and fabricating evidence against the student during the
proceeding; and the "bail condition" imposed by the prosecution on the
student violated the Ontario Human Rights Code;
(4). Right to freedom and liberty guaranteed by s. 7 of the Charter by
this criminal prosecution that was politically motivated to interfere
with the student's human rights case.
Now the courts both in California, USA, and in Canada are actively
engaging themselves in the oppression of my law suits against the
perpetrators of my human rights case. It is the best evidence for
American and Canada's hypocrisy in their propaganda on "human rights
cause" - they only use it as a political weapon against other nations.
For the story, please visit
http://www.geocities.com/wliao.geo/
