djkottke
11-26-2005, 09:48 AM
I live and work in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Last year I accepted a position with a local software company to head up new business development. In my offer letter, it stated as part of the details of the offer:
- 40 hours of personal time per year
- 3 weeks paid vacation at start date
- Additional vacation accrues at 5 hours per pay period starting in 6 months
I very much consider this a component of my compensation, and as such negotiated this.
At 1 year, I resigned with 112 hours of accrued-but-unused vacation. I gave 2 weeks notice, and the next day received an email telling me it was time to move on, and I didn't need to return to work.
When I received my final paycheck it didn't include my unused vacation (or bonuses due, but that is another story). I talked to the department of labor, and they said I should send a registered letter to my former company requesting payment, and that my vacation pay is due within 60 days or according to company policy.
I sent a registered letter requesting payment. Within a couple days I received a call from the company to which they outsource their HR and payroll. I was informed that company policy is to not pay unused vacation. This is the first time I have ever heard of a company with such a policy, and never saw such policy at this company (we didn't have an employee handbook either).
I am preparing to go to concilliation court. The 60 days is up in mid-December. What i found for laws from the state are:
excerpt from MN D of Labor website:
I quit (was fired, laid off, separated) and my employer won’t pay me my vacation (severance) pay. What can I do?
Company policy can determine when any benefits are due such as vacation, sick leave and severance packages. Benefits are payable within 60 days of when they become due. If owed and not paid by the employer, you can file your claim for those benefits in the conciliation court in the county where you worked for the employer (see Minnesota Statutes 181.74).
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/181/74.html
My question is how does the court view this? Do I have a case?
Thanks in advance for any input!!! :)
- 40 hours of personal time per year
- 3 weeks paid vacation at start date
- Additional vacation accrues at 5 hours per pay period starting in 6 months
I very much consider this a component of my compensation, and as such negotiated this.
At 1 year, I resigned with 112 hours of accrued-but-unused vacation. I gave 2 weeks notice, and the next day received an email telling me it was time to move on, and I didn't need to return to work.
When I received my final paycheck it didn't include my unused vacation (or bonuses due, but that is another story). I talked to the department of labor, and they said I should send a registered letter to my former company requesting payment, and that my vacation pay is due within 60 days or according to company policy.
I sent a registered letter requesting payment. Within a couple days I received a call from the company to which they outsource their HR and payroll. I was informed that company policy is to not pay unused vacation. This is the first time I have ever heard of a company with such a policy, and never saw such policy at this company (we didn't have an employee handbook either).
I am preparing to go to concilliation court. The 60 days is up in mid-December. What i found for laws from the state are:
excerpt from MN D of Labor website:
I quit (was fired, laid off, separated) and my employer won’t pay me my vacation (severance) pay. What can I do?
Company policy can determine when any benefits are due such as vacation, sick leave and severance packages. Benefits are payable within 60 days of when they become due. If owed and not paid by the employer, you can file your claim for those benefits in the conciliation court in the county where you worked for the employer (see Minnesota Statutes 181.74).
http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/181/74.html
My question is how does the court view this? Do I have a case?
Thanks in advance for any input!!! :)
