Goofy
10-13-2004, 01:43 PM
State of California
Our department has an older workforce of 22 employees. 2 months ago one retired and one quit. Their jobs were advertised and filled, one internally and one coming from the East coast. Both of these replacements are under 30 years old.
One week after the first replacement started work and three weeks before the second started, Management announced that there would be a layoff, due to a reduction in indirect base. When questioned as to why we were hiring two replacements during a layoff, we were told that they did not know next years base would be so low and that the company had already made commitments to these two people and that they could not back out at this time.
Today the lay-off notices were issued to five employees, the youngest being 51 and the average time at the company is around 20-25 years.
Is there an age discrimination issue here or does the law allow for inert management.
Our department has an older workforce of 22 employees. 2 months ago one retired and one quit. Their jobs were advertised and filled, one internally and one coming from the East coast. Both of these replacements are under 30 years old.
One week after the first replacement started work and three weeks before the second started, Management announced that there would be a layoff, due to a reduction in indirect base. When questioned as to why we were hiring two replacements during a layoff, we were told that they did not know next years base would be so low and that the company had already made commitments to these two people and that they could not back out at this time.
Today the lay-off notices were issued to five employees, the youngest being 51 and the average time at the company is around 20-25 years.
Is there an age discrimination issue here or does the law allow for inert management.
