DTJ wrote:

Yes. However there are certain assumptions you are making that the judge will not. can and does read the speed of the faster, larger vehicle. Cops like to think they can point and aim accurately, but based on how poorly they do in shoot outs, we all know this is not the case.

Lets see....you are comparing aiming a speed testing device to determine
a vehicle's speed to being in a life or death situation where someone is
trying to kill you???? You need to go to the SPCA and get a dog, and
name him "Clue"........so you will have one.

All it takes is some of the waves to be reflected off the faster vehicle, which will happen unless the gun is so close to your car that the officer gets run over, and it will automatically read the higher, incorrect speed.

Again....you are clueless.
However, the courts have ruled time and time again that physics do not apply in a courtroom.

Please cite the cases that physics do not apply.

On Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:35:10 -0400, "nitespark(nospam)"
<"nitespark(nospam)"@cox.net> wrote:DTJ wrote: All it takes is some of the waves to be reflected off the faster vehicle, which will happen unless the gun is so close to your car that the officer gets run over, and it will automatically read the higher, incorrect speed.Again....you are clueless.

And you are an asshole. So what.
However, the courts have ruled time and time again that physics do not apply in a courtroom.Please cite the cases that physics do not apply.

Every time the courts find someone guilty of speeding when they were
in front of a larger vehicle that was overtaking them.

Please cite the cases that proved you were not an idiot.

On Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:46:21 GMT, "motocat" <nospam@hotmail.com>
wrote:DTJ -- you are another funny poster who has been in the sand box to long.

Thanks?