dmv test

There is no crosswalk and you see a pedestrian
crossing your lane ahead. You should:

1. Make eye contact and then run him/her over. YES

2.Slow down as you pass him/her. NO

3.Stop and let him/her finish crossing the street. NO

VMD wrote:
dmv test There is no crosswalk and you see a pedestrian crossing your lane ahead. You should: 1. Make eye contact and then run him/her over. YES 2.Slow down as you pass him/her. NO 3.Stop and let him/her finish crossing the street. NO

In my understanding, an intersection is considered to have crosswalks even
if they are not physically painted on the pavement. In that case, you
should definitely stop and let the pedestian finish crossing the street.
Even if that's not the case, you should still slow down (or stop if
necessary) for his safety. Sorry if I'm a kill-joy.

Dai

--
Daigoro F. Toyama
1999 M3 Coupe

On 9 Jul 2003 14:48:48 -0700, Dvmmvd@aol.com (VMD) wrote:
dmv testThere is no crosswalk and you see a pedestriancrossing your lane ahead. You should:1. Make eye contact and then run him/her over. YES2.Slow down as you pass him/her. NO3.Stop and let him/her finish crossing the street. NO

I know it's irritating when someone deliberately walks into your
car's path - irrationally daring you to hit them. Try to remember
that most of them are drunken republicans and haven't the faintest
idea what they're doing.

On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:51:41 -0600, aunt millie wrote:
On 9 Jul 2003 14:48:48 -0700, Dvmmvd@aol.com (VMD) wrote:dmv testThere is no crosswalk and you see a pedestriancrossing your lane ahead. You should:1. Make eye contact and then run him/her over. YES2.Slow down as you pass him/her. NO3.Stop and let him/her finish crossing the street. NOI know it's irritating when someone deliberately walks into yourcar's path - irrationally daring you to hit them. Try to rememberthat most of them are drunken republicans and haven't the faintestidea what they're doing.


You're all heart!

On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 21:51:41 -0600, aunt millie wrote:
I know it's irritating when someone deliberately walks into yourcar's path - irrationally daring you to hit them. Try to rememberthat most of them are drunken republicans and haven't the faintestidea what they're doing.

Is aunt millie tacitly admitting that "she" doesn't yield to
pedestrians, even when the law requires it?

--
ricardo, ex-euroslav vancouver bc canada
e-mail: remove spamfreezone to reply
for liability purposes: I *always* obey the law.
'89 grand am le, garaged; '91 mx6 gt

aunt millie wrote in message news:<aiopgvo54fs4glg2hlsq2j42p1jb1c1q26@4ax.com>... I know it's irritating when someone deliberately walks into your car's path - irrationally daring you to hit them. Try to remember that most of them are drunken republicans and haven't the faintest idea what they're doing.

At least they're not behind a wheel.

On 9 Jul 2003 14:48:48 -0700, Dvmmvd@aol.com (VMD) ranted:
dmv testThere is no crosswalk and you see a pedestriancrossing your lane ahead. You should:1. Make eye contact and then run him/her over. YES2.Slow down as you pass him/her. NO3.Stop and let him/her finish crossing the street. NO

Before I answer, one question: is the pedestrian Hillary
Clinton?

Ken (NY)
Chairman,
Department Of Redundancy Department
____________________________________
email:
http://www.geocities.com/bluesguy68/email.htm

"[Saddam Hussein]cannot be permitted to go
unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific
objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons
of mass destruction..."
-Senator John Kerry, D-Mass 1997

Q: What the hardest thing about rollerblading?
A: Telling your parents you’re gay.

VMD wrote: There is no crosswalk and you see a pedestrian crossing your lane ahead. You should:

Change lanes and zoom by six feet in front of him at 60 mph, while
laying on the horn loud enough to make him change his pants.