Joe42
05-08-2005, 10:45 PM
If you touch someone's arm, but not in the form of a grab, but as two fingers above the elbow, and this is before they say, "don't touch me!" would that constitute assault or battery under Colorado law?
I'll give some context: Jill and Jack are arguing. Jill walks past Jack, Jack says, "Don't you go away," and touches Jill's arm as she passes. Jill says, "don't you touch me again or I'll call the police!" Jack sees that Jill is hysterical and has indicated a preference for no further contact so he doesn't touch her after that point. The argument remains verbal.
common sense says this isn't assault or battery. If the touch is not a closed hand over the arm, which would be a restraining move, nor is it done after a verbal request for no contact, it sounds like the one of the "safe" forms of contact such as handshakes, tapping someone on the shoulder, or patting someone on the back (non-sexually). The law I've seen says "harm or intent to harm." The question is, what kind of a chance would Jill have of successfully arguing that this contact was an assault or battery?
I'll give some context: Jill and Jack are arguing. Jill walks past Jack, Jack says, "Don't you go away," and touches Jill's arm as she passes. Jill says, "don't you touch me again or I'll call the police!" Jack sees that Jill is hysterical and has indicated a preference for no further contact so he doesn't touch her after that point. The argument remains verbal.
common sense says this isn't assault or battery. If the touch is not a closed hand over the arm, which would be a restraining move, nor is it done after a verbal request for no contact, it sounds like the one of the "safe" forms of contact such as handshakes, tapping someone on the shoulder, or patting someone on the back (non-sexually). The law I've seen says "harm or intent to harm." The question is, what kind of a chance would Jill have of successfully arguing that this contact was an assault or battery?
