atomicboy
04-30-2007, 02:16 PM
I work for an employer and we are being sued by a non-exempt employee for overtime. I will give you quick background so you may answer my two questions.
100% commission inside sales position. Employee received both w-2 and 1099 income to a marketing company (1099 was for commissions). W-2 only income employee did not make 1 1/2 times min wage but W-2 + 1099 = 10 times min wage. Can 1099 income for commissions made payable to a marketing company which is a sole proprietership (employee is sole owner) be part of the funds that push the employee over the 1 1/2 times barrier for overtime to be exempt? (edit don't ask why he was paid 1099 to a marketing company as I have no idea as it was a decision made from above)
Lastly, this went to a labor hearing where the commissioner ruled in my favor. The employee appealed the decision and we are now at a trial de Novo. At a trial de Novo is the burden of proof still on the plaintiff? If so I asked for daily time records so I could refute them and perjure him under oath. At the hearing the employee mentioned he had them on his computer and only worked in the office. At a deposition he changed his story on where he worked the hours and says he no longer has the time records and he no longer has the computer.
Can I use the hearing transcript against him? (showing a change of story)
How can I refute the hours worked when he will not produce the daily timesheets he once said he had? All I have is the DLSE-55 records which are based weekly not daily. What should I do in this situation? I can perjure him in other areas and shoot his credibility to hell and make him seen unbelievable, is this my best defense at this point? Thank you for any help.
100% commission inside sales position. Employee received both w-2 and 1099 income to a marketing company (1099 was for commissions). W-2 only income employee did not make 1 1/2 times min wage but W-2 + 1099 = 10 times min wage. Can 1099 income for commissions made payable to a marketing company which is a sole proprietership (employee is sole owner) be part of the funds that push the employee over the 1 1/2 times barrier for overtime to be exempt? (edit don't ask why he was paid 1099 to a marketing company as I have no idea as it was a decision made from above)
Lastly, this went to a labor hearing where the commissioner ruled in my favor. The employee appealed the decision and we are now at a trial de Novo. At a trial de Novo is the burden of proof still on the plaintiff? If so I asked for daily time records so I could refute them and perjure him under oath. At the hearing the employee mentioned he had them on his computer and only worked in the office. At a deposition he changed his story on where he worked the hours and says he no longer has the time records and he no longer has the computer.
Can I use the hearing transcript against him? (showing a change of story)
How can I refute the hours worked when he will not produce the daily timesheets he once said he had? All I have is the DLSE-55 records which are based weekly not daily. What should I do in this situation? I can perjure him in other areas and shoot his credibility to hell and make him seen unbelievable, is this my best defense at this point? Thank you for any help.
