Maybe it is time to contact the companies who advertise in papers such as
the Boston Globe. Inform the companies they are stripping away traditional
family values and marriage because of their advertising dollars spent in the
paper.
This posting was found on another
newsgroup. It is interesting because it attacks the advertises of the
newspapers. Maybe this way news organization will go back to basic
journalism not lies.

"@" <@@@.com> wrote in message news:<7Pwrc.93168$xw3.5290903@attbi_s04>... "creosote" <Jaggedridge@aol.com> wrote in message news:e9d4fd66.0405191320.6961a244@posting.google.c om... zero@nowhere.com (Paul Revere) wrote in message news:<WTiqc.34056$5a.17847@okepread03>... In article <e9d4fd66.0405172208.947afed@posting.google.com>, Jaggedridge@aol.com (creosote) wrote: >Pick up a copy of the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington >Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, etc. Such liberal publications as >these are spread thickly over the American landscape, daily polluting >our minds with their radical leftwing treasonous claptrap. Things >were going great in the Mideast until they began hammering away at
our >foreign policy in conjunction with John Ferry's presidential bid. >They have one weakness. Their very existence depends on advertising. >In the pages of one of these rags, do you see an advertisement from a >company that you have recently made a significant purchase from, plan >to make a significant purchase from, or regularly patronize? Give
the >head office a call. Tell them that if they keep advertising in that >particular leftwing publication or any other leftwing publication,
you >will no longer patronize their business, you will not make a major >purchase with them, or you will think of a good excuse to take some >recently purchased merchandise back to the store from which you
bought >it. If only a few thousand people across this country called these >advertisers up tomorrow and threatened them with a significant loss
of >business, the offending publications would be hearing about it and >feeling the pinch forthwith. It's the American way. When all else >fails, bankrupt the bastards.

Danny Boy wrote:
Maybe it is time to contact the companies who advertise in papers such as the Boston Globe. Inform the companies they are stripping away traditional family values and marriage because of their advertising dollars spent in the paper. This posting was found on another newsgroup. It is interesting because it attacks the advertises of the newspapers. Maybe this way news organization will go back to basic journalism not lies. "@" <@@@.com> wrote in message news:<7Pwrc.93168$xw3.5290903@attbi_s04>... "creosote" <Jaggedridge@aol.com> wrote in message news:e9d4fd66.0405191320.6961a244@posting.google.c om... zero@nowhere.com (Paul Revere) wrote in message news:<WTiqc.34056$5a.17847@okepread03>... > In article <e9d4fd66.0405172208.947afed@posting.google.com>, Jaggedridge@aol.com (creosote) wrote: > >Pick up a copy of the New York Times, the L.A. Times, the Washington > >Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, etc. Such liberal publications > >as these are spread thickly over the American landscape, daily > >polluting > >our minds with their radical leftwing treasonous claptrap. Things > >were going great in the Mideast until they began hammering away at our > >foreign policy in conjunction with John Ferry's presidential bid. > >They have one weakness. Their very existence depends on > >advertising. In the pages of one of these rags, do you see an > >advertisement from a company that you have recently made a > >significant purchase from, plan > >to make a significant purchase from, or regularly patronize? Give the > >head office a call. Tell them that if they keep advertising in that > >particular leftwing publication or any other leftwing publication, you > >will no longer patronize their business, you will not make a major > >purchase with them, or you will think of a good excuse to take some > >recently purchased merchandise back to the store from which you bought > >it. If only a few thousand people across this country called these > >advertisers up tomorrow and threatened them with a significant loss of > >business, the offending publications would be hearing about it and > >feeling the pinch forthwith. It's the American way. When all else > >fails, bankrupt the bastards.

It was said 2000 years ago - you can't have both a worship of money and a
regard for real human values at the same time. My wife has made it plain
time and time again that she would have money rather than a caring relative
any day.

Doug.
--
He who says that a thing cannot be done is likely to be interrupted by the
person doing it.
- Chinese proverb.

"Doug Laidlaw" <laidlaws@myaccess.com.au> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:bjj9o1-76r.ln1@dougshost.mydomain.org.au... Danny Boy wrote: It was said 2000 years ago - you can't have both a worship of money and a regard for real human values at the same time. My wife has made it plain time and time again that she would have money rather than a caring
relative any day. Doug. -- He who says that a thing cannot be done is likely to be interrupted by the person doing it. - Chinese proverb.


Wonder what kind of wife you have...material people have always been
suspecious to me because they miss to see what's truly important is in life.