In article <c7iih7$6p7$3@pita.alt.net>, Ignoramus26392 wrote: In article <pA0nc.12047$Hs1.5294@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink. net>, Tsam Nami wrote: "Ignoramus16619" <ignoramus16619@NOSPAM.16619.invalid> I think that I finally understand what was happening. The prisoners were humiliated and their humiliation photographed, for "blackmail" purposes. Such as, the investigator would threaten that if you do not divulge members of your resistance cell, we will make photographs of your humiliation public. That's why there are so many of them. This is the most plausible explanation.

I would like to gloat a little bit and point out how right I
was. I deduced, correctly, what was happening at AB and why torture
was photographed to such an extent, way before more revelations became
public.

I was the first to figure it out.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=615&e=4&u=/nm/20040512/pl_nm/iraq_abuse_congress_dc

``Senate Armed Services Committee (news - web sites) Chairman John
Warner, a Virginia Republican, said he understood humiliating
photographs were used to threaten prisoners to give information.

"These youngsters didn't understand the nuances of Muslim culture to
have, some people say, staged those photographs, which I understand
were going to be shown to the prisoners' family by way of threat
unless he came forward with some valuable information," Warner
said. "The plot is thickening."''

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
char*p="char*p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
"It's never too late to have a happy childhood."

said he understood humiliating photographs were used to

divert attention of the American Public away from the 9-11 Investigation, I
would say.... And what a darn good job they did of it too!

Em

said he understood humiliating photographs were used to

divert attention of the American Public away from the 9-11 Investigation, I
would say.... And what a darn good job they did of it too!

Em