tia38
10-18-2006, 08:21 AM
I'm trying to sort out how much time my employer must provide if I have complications BEFORE I actually give birth, and how that time is counted against leave I would like to schedule AFTER the birth.
As background I live and work in MA; I am covered by FMLA (as in the company I work for), and eligible for MMLA.
If I have complications before I give birth that requires me to miss work (for example required bedrest due to pre-eclampsia or sciatica), does that time count against FMLA and/or MMLA?
And if it counts against both in essence that means I could be entitled to less than 8 weeks AFTER the birth of my child?
Does it make a difference if the time is contiguous with the birth of the child (as in I give birth while out on bedrest), or not (i.e., I am out for a week or two, I return to work for some lenght of time, and then am out again for the birth).
I am concerned more with duration of time off, not whether or not it is paid.
Hope that makes some sense.
Thanks in advance,
-Tia
As background I live and work in MA; I am covered by FMLA (as in the company I work for), and eligible for MMLA.
If I have complications before I give birth that requires me to miss work (for example required bedrest due to pre-eclampsia or sciatica), does that time count against FMLA and/or MMLA?
And if it counts against both in essence that means I could be entitled to less than 8 weeks AFTER the birth of my child?
Does it make a difference if the time is contiguous with the birth of the child (as in I give birth while out on bedrest), or not (i.e., I am out for a week or two, I return to work for some lenght of time, and then am out again for the birth).
I am concerned more with duration of time off, not whether or not it is paid.
Hope that makes some sense.
Thanks in advance,
-Tia
