"Stephanie Stowe" <stowe@whackthisvsac.org> writes:
"Doug Anderson" <ethelthelog@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:xFrYb.51611$_44.48809@attbi_s52... "Stephanie Stowe" <stowe@whackthisvsac.org> writes:
That's entirely the point. If you did NOT feel that way, and your husband just insisted on more, more, more without a mind open for helping you to get to feeling that way, you might feel a bit used. Just for the record, are you writing this while thinking about the OP? Or is this just some theoretical consideration? The OP is not insisting on more, more, more; so it really is a reply to Shiela's reply.

So we're talking about some hypothetical ASM whipping-boy, and any
resemblance to posters past or present is merely coincidental.
I heartily agree with the folks within this thread who say some change in communication is in order.

Yeah!

"Doug Anderson" <ethelthelog@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:f7ad3h5ybb.fsf@noether.uoregon.edu... "Stephanie Stowe" <stowe@whackthisvsac.org> writes: "Doug Anderson" <ethelthelog@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:xFrYb.51611$_44.48809@attbi_s52... "Stephanie Stowe" <stowe@whackthisvsac.org> writes: > That's entirely the point. If you did NOT feel that way, and your husband > just insisted on more, more, more without a mind open for helping
you to get > to feeling that way, you might feel a bit used. Just for the record, are you writing this while thinking about the OP? Or is this just some theoretical consideration? The OP is not insisting on more, more, more; so it really is a reply to Shiela's reply. So we're talking about some hypothetical ASM whipping-boy, and any resemblance to posters past or present is merely coincidental.


Honestly. I got confused with a post in another group. Sorry OP and folks
with whom I argued.

If you combine a strong enthuisiasm for arguing with terminal flakiness, you
eat crow on usenet a lot.
I heartily agree with the folks within this thread who say some change in communication is in order. Yeah!