In article <steve-B2F35A.15334713022005@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
Steve White <steve@spam.me.never> wrote:Good heavens, that would lead to "corporate welfare", and we can't havethat!

You claim that "corporate welfare" is a liberal buzzword and therefore
meaningless. How about Bush and company using "class warfare" whenever
anyone criticized his tax cuts for the rich. I know, it's different when
republicans do it.

In article <curcbs$gp6@tracy.umd.edu>,
lfortney@dc.umd.edu (Linda Fortney) wrote:
In article <steve-B2F35A.15334713022005@comcast.dca.giganews.com>, Steve White <steve@spam.me.never> wrote:Good heavens, that would lead to "corporate welfare", and we can't havethat! You claim that "corporate welfare" is a liberal buzzword and therefore meaningless. How about Bush and company using "class warfare" whenever anyone criticized his tax cuts for the rich. I know, it's different when republicans do it.


Well, both terms are accurate :-)

I was being a little facetious in the prior post, as you may have
detected.





steve