>ubject: Re: Times: Blair's lieutenant adopts American babyFrom: Robin Harritt no.spam.for@me.thanksDate: 2/3/2005 1:23 P.M. Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <36f8frF528h08U10@individual.net>Chosenchildinc1 wrote: 72 hours Kathy, that is the norm, every state I know of requires a 72 hour period before the consent can be signed. Again all of this is on ABCadoption, just click on the state, it tells you everythingWhereas you are so stupid that you make all sorts of claims about the UK butyoudon't even know what the Civil Service is and couldn't manage to look it uponthe Civil Service website, and you haven't a clue about adoption in England &Wales because you're far too stupid to read the DfES adoption web site or thewebsites of any of the adoption agencies in England & Wales.Robin

Robin,when I run out of the back of cereal boxes to read, I will read your
website. I am sure it is as anally impacted as you are. A real plethora or
rules, regulations, and obstacles to nice, decent people who just want to have
a family with children.

I know what a civil servant is, you.

>Subject: Re: Times: Blair's lieutenant adopts American babyFrom: chosenchildinc1@aol.com (Chosenchildinc1)Date: 2/3/2005 8:05 PM Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <20050203200502.13387.00000336@mb-m27.aol.com>ubject: Re: Times: Blair's lieutenant adopts American babyFrom: Robin Harritt no.spam.for@me.thanksDate: 2/3/2005 1:23 P.M. Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <36f8frF528h08U10@individual.net>Chosenchildinc1 wrote: 72 hours Kathy, that is the norm, every state I know of requires a 72 hour period before the consent can be signed. Again all of this is on ABCadoption, just click on the state, it tells you everythingWhereas you are so stupid that you make all sorts of claims about the UK butyoudon't even know what the Civil Service is and couldn't manage to look it uponthe Civil Service website, and you haven't a clue about adoption in England&Wales because you're far too stupid to read the DfES adoption web site orthewebsites of any of the adoption agencies in England & Wales.RobinRobin,when I run out of the back of cereal boxes to read, I will read yourwebsite.

Although I haven't been there lately, I found Robin's website to be quite
fascinating and informative.
I am sure it is as anally impacted as you are.

There is almost nothing in this world that a good enema wouldn't cure.
A real plethora or rules, regulations, and obstacles to nice, decent people
who just want tohave a family with children.

On the contrary, for the most part it's about his personal experience as an
adopted child and
later, his search for information regarding his biological heritage.

If you're more entertained and informed by reading the back of a box of
Wheaties, then by all means stick to what interests you.

Dad

Chosenchildinc1 wrote:
I know what a civil servant is, you.


You don't have a clue a what civil servant is Marcy and you've made a
complete arse of yourself several times by pretending that you do. Civil
servants don't work in adoption agencies, they don't make decisions
about who can adopt an individual's baby. Because you have the brain
power of intellectually backward mollusc , you are unable to distinguish
between, civil servant, public servant, private sector, and voluntary
sector employees. I'm none of those btw, I'm self employed in my day
job. And fully trained but completely unpaid for the voluntary work that
I do as a support worker and mentor for adults affected by adoption.


Robin

>Subject: Re: Times: Blair's lieutenant adopts American babyFrom: Robin Harritt no.spam.for@me.thanksDate: 2/4/2005 4:42 A.M. Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <36gubdF50v4n0U3@individual.net>Chosenchildinc1 wrote: I know what a civil servant is, you.You don't have a clue a what civil servant is Marcy and you've made acomplete arse of yourself several times by pretending that you do. Civilservants don't work in adoption agencies, they don't make decisionsabout who can adopt an individual's baby. Because you have the brainpower of intellectually backward mollusc , you are unable to distinguishbetween, civil servant, public servant, private sector, and voluntarysector employees. I'm none of those btw, I'm self employed in my dayjob. And fully trained but completely unpaid for the voluntary work thatI do as a support worker and mentor for adults affected by adoption.Robin

Robin, the fact that you have such major psych. issues and they let you loose
around adults affected by adoption scares the **** out of me. A stalker who
admittedly uses seven assumed names to harass birthmothers on adoption.com and
alt.adoption should be reported to the authorities. Really scary stuff.

Chosenchildinc1 wrote:
Subject: Re: Times: Blair's lieutenant adopts American babyFrom: Robin Harritt no.spam.for@me.thanks Date: 2/4/2005 4:42 A.M. Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <36gubdF50v4n0U3@individual.net>Chosenchildinc1 wrote: I know what a civil servant is, you. You don't have a clue a what civil servant is Marcy and you've made a complete arse of yourself several times by pretending that you do. Civil servants don't work in adoption agencies, they don't make decisions about who can adopt an individual's baby. Because you have the brain power of intellectually backward mollusc , you are unable to distinguish between, civil servant, public servant, private sector, and voluntary sector employees. I'm none of those btw, I'm self employed in my day job. And fully trained but completely unpaid for the voluntary work that I do as a support worker and mentor for adults affected by adoption.Robin Robin, the fact that you have such major psych. issues and they let you loosearound adults affected by adoption scares the **** out of me. A stalker whoadmittedly uses seven assumed names to harass birthmothers on adoption.com andalt.adoption should be reported to the authorities. Really scary stuff.


Yep, carry on Marcy give your friend Jackie a great big lovebite and
show everyone else just how ridiculous you are.


I rarely post on any other topic than adoption law and politics on
adoption.com, Marcy. I know you'd find that very intimidating, one of
the things we all want is to make sure that English law will always
punish people seeking to profit personally from adoption, to its fullest
extent. But I don't think it would be very intimidating most natural
mothers.


I no longer regard Jackie as primarily a birthmother (many 'first
mothers' would consider it an insult to be called a birthmother, but
Jackie loves it) I see her as a tragic trouble making old loony who
shot all her brain cells to bits with drugs and alcohol in the sixties
and seventies. I just pity her kept kids. No wonder her daughter doesn't
have much to do with her any more and she only hears from her
relinquished son once in a blue moon. The best advice anyone could give
to Jackie is to throw away all those crap amateur psychology self-help
paperbacks, and get some proper therapy from an experienced trained
therapist with an understanding of adoption issues. But she's been told
that again and again over the years. She enjoys being a nasty poisonous
little old woman, that must be why she's crept up your derrière.


Robin