On: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 18:40:46 -0500
Jackie <somewhere@aol> wrote:
<snip>
The Impact on Mothers - View Parsed
<snip>
I'm not at all sure why you think this proves your accusation. I do find it
hilarious that this was the best you could come up with, though, given
all the time you had. Was this the "...better things to do.." that you told
Jennie about? Geez, I hope not.
<snip>
Why can't she take a couple of years?
I don't recall saying she couldn't. Nowhere did I write that she had x
amount of time to tell her. Simply that, if she didn't, I would. But I must
say, it sounds suspiously like you believe the birthfather should tell the
truth only when he has permission from the (birth)mother. IOW, "...some
of the truth some of the time.. ". Not really a surprise what with your
agenda and all. Fact is, though, she took 24 years. Do you believe that
was long enough?
Now then, how long was it before you told your son that you don't know
who his birthfather is? I know it wasn't during your first, second, or even
third conversation.
>Subject: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's Adoption Bill )From: qwasimodem@aol.com (Qwasimodem)Date: 12/11/2004 8:46 AM Pacific Standard TimeMessage-id: <20041211114653.06125.00001066@mb-m23.aol.com
<snip>
Jackie <jdajda@newsguy.com>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:00:16 -0400"My child was a problem that had to be solved. "
Every time I read this, I shudder.
Kathy
Palms2pines
12-11-2004, 03:23 PM
>>Jackie <jdajda@newsguy.com>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:00:16 -0400"My child was a problem that had to be solved. "Every time I read this, I shudder.Kathy
Yet, how true to Jackie's character, huh? Never a word about what the impending
"problem" might need. Never a word about what might be best for the impending
problem. It was all about Jackie back then, all about Jackie now, and shall
evermore be.
P2P
Jackie
12-11-2004, 03:47 PM
On 11 Dec 2004 16:46:53 GMT, qwasimodem@aol.com (Qwasimodem) wrote:
Still no answers, eh?
you must have missed this..
On 07 Dec 2004 02:34:44 GMT, qwasimodem@aol.com (Qwasimodem) wrote:
That said, I wonder...would you care to back up your accusation withproof?
Lines: 22
X-Admin: n...@aol.com
From: qwasimo...@aol.com (Qwasimodem)
Newsgroups: alt.adoption
Date: 09 Oct 2002 23:19:43 GMT
References: <qer7qugj6ikokne183tru6p0mom9qct75t@4ax.com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: The Impact on Mothers
Message-ID: <20021009191943.20591.00000427@mb-ch.aol.com>
On:10/9/02 2:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Jackie C jda...@newsguy.com wrote:
<snip>
or..What if the adoptee was not told he or she was adopted? What if thebirth mother wants that secret 'outed'?
Should they (afamily) be made to tell the telling?
<snip>
While my daughter wasn't an "adoptee", she wasn't aware, (or so her
mother
thought), that her father wasn't her biofather. When I contacted her
mother, I
made it clear that if she didn't tell her, I would.
Gary
End of quoting..
So Gary.. Why is it okay for you to take two years to tell your
birthson about his half sister and not okay for the woman who had one
of your children? Why can't she take a couple of years?
Jackie
LilMtnCbn
12-11-2004, 04:38 PM
>Subject: Re: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's Adoption Bill)From: Jackie somewhere@aolDate: 12/11/2004 4:47 PM Mountain Standard TimeMessage-id: <in1nr0p5so2emc20eaa9v3chqbss5ska14@4ax.com>
So Gary.. Why is it okay for you to take two years to tell yourbirthson about his half sister and not okay for the woman who had oneof your children? Why can't she take a couple of years?Jackie
So Jackie.. Have you told your son you tried to have him aborted yet?
-------------------------
A good friend will come and bail you out of jail . . . but, a true friend will
be sitting next to you saying, "Damn . . . that was fun!"
-----Unknown
Qwasimodem
12-11-2004, 05:33 PM
On: 12/11/04 6:47 PM Eastern Standard Time
Jackie somewhere@aol wrote:
<snip>
you must have missed this..
<snip>
I haven't missed anything and you still haven't answered the questions.
And we both know, along with most everyone reading here, that you
won't.
>Subject: Re: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's Adoption Bill)From: palms2pines@aol.comh8spam (Palms2pines)Date: 12/11/2004 3:23 PM Pacific Standard TimeMessage-id: <20041211182334.06675.00001601@mb-m15.aol.com>Jackie <jdajda@newsguy.com>Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:00:16 -0400"My child was a problem that had to be solved. "Every time I read this, I shudder.KathyYet, how true to Jackie's character, huh? Never a word about what theimpending"problem" might need. Never a word about what might be best for the impendingproblem. It was all about Jackie back then, all about Jackie now, and shallevermore be.P2P
Hammer, nailed. I had hoped to see some growth in Rickie Solinger's " pal ",
but I digress......
Kathy
Kathy
12-12-2004, 10:46 AM
>Subject: Re: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's Adoption Bill)From: Jackie somewhere@aolDate: 12/11/2004 3:47 PM Pacific Standard TimeMessage-id: <in1nr0p5so2emc20eaa9v3chqbss5ska14@4ax.com>On 11 Dec 2004 16:46:53 GMT, qwasimodem@aol.com (Qwasimodem) wrote:Still no answers, eh?you must have missed this..
(snip babble)
You still have not addressed Gary's questions.
Kathy
Kathy
12-12-2004, 10:47 AM
>Subject: Re: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's Adoption Bill)From: lilmtncbn@aol.com (LilMtnCbn)Date: 12/11/2004 4:38 PM Pacific Standard TimeMessage-id: <20041211193803.06417.00001246@mb-m22.aol.com>Subject: Re: No answers from Jackie ( was Re: Marilyn Churley's AdoptionBill)From: Jackie somewhere@aolDate: 12/11/2004 4:47 PM Mountain Standard TimeMessage-id: <in1nr0p5so2emc20eaa9v3chqbss5ska14@4ax.com>So Gary.. Why is it okay for you to take two years to tell yourbirthson about his half sister and not okay for the woman who had oneof your children? Why can't she take a couple of years?JackieSo Jackie.. Have you told your son you tried to have him aborted yet?
Yeah, " that problem that had to be solved, ".....her son. Ugh.
Kathy
Complete Labor
Law Poster for $24.95 from www.LaborLawCenter.com,
includes State, Federal, & OSHA posting requirements