ubject: OH Mom,previously TPR'd allowed Court visits w kid
From: fern5827@aol.com (Fern5827)
Date: 12/1/2004 10:53 AM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: <20041201105336.10328.00000843@mb-m25.aol.com>

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041130/NEWS01/411300
354/1056/news01

"That visit, under the supervision of the Hamilton County Department of Job and
Family Services, is believed to be the first time in Ohio that a parent who
permanently lost custody of a child has legally been allowed to see that child
again."

DESCRIPTORS; OHIO, CSB, CPS, HAMILTON COUNTY, DJFS, FAMILY SERVICES, CPS, CHILD
ABUSE, DRUG ABUSE, FAMILY LAW, CAPTA, ASFA, TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS,
TPR, MOTHERHOOD

"Fern5827" <fern5827@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041201111140.10328.00000847@mb-m25.aol.com... ubject: OH Mom,previously TPR'd allowed Court visits w kid From: fern5827@aol.com (Fern5827) Date: 12/1/2004 10:53 AM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: <20041201105336.10328.00000843@mb-m25.aol.com> http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041130/NEWS01/411300 354/1056/news01 "That visit, under the supervision of the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services, is believed to be the first time in Ohio that a parent who permanently lost custody of a child has legally been allowed to see that child again." DESCRIPTORS; OHIO, CSB, CPS, HAMILTON COUNTY, DJFS, FAMILY SERVICES, CPS, CHILD ABUSE, DRUG ABUSE, FAMILY LAW, CAPTA, ASFA, TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, TPR, MOTHERHOOD

Things are different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

This case is not relevant to Ontario.

In Ontario, two types of Crown Wardship Orders can be made - without access
for the purpose of adoption, and with access if adoption is not being
considered - often for older children.

Where an order for Crown Wardship is made, and the child is not adopted, a
natural parent can make an aapplication to have access, or to have the Crown
Wardship order terminated and the child returned, where there has been a
material change in circumstannces since the making of the last order, and
the change would be in the best interests of the child.

As always this is general advice, and follow up with a lawyer is always
recommended.

Doug Thomas
Welland, Ontario

Well, duh, Doug. I think most folks posting to this NG understand that Canada
is a soverign nation.

Not at all under the laws of the United States. That is why the headline
states OH.

Oh, and by the way---the apellation in the US is the Supreme Court of the
United States---not the Supreme Court of North America.

OH= Ohio.

Doug noted:
Subject: Re: OH Mom, TPR'd now can see kid with Court approvalFrom: "doug thomas" thomform@iaw.on.caDate: 12/1/2004 6:23 PM Eastern Standard TimeMessage-id: <wtednS38vY1J_TLcRVn-2g@golden.net>"Fern5827" <fern5827@aol.com> wrote in messagenews:20041201111140.10328.00000847@mb-m25.aol.com... ubject: OH Mom,previously TPR'd allowed Court visits w kid From: fern5827@aol.com (Fern5827) Date: 12/1/2004 10:53 AM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: <20041201105336.10328.00000843@mb-m25.aol.com> http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20041130/NEWS01/411300 354/1056/news01 "That visit, under the supervision of the Hamilton County Department of Job and Family Services, is believed to be the first time in Ohio that a parent who permanently lost custody of a child has legally been allowed to see that child again." DESCRIPTORS; OHIO, CSB, CPS, HAMILTON COUNTY, DJFS, FAMILY SERVICES, CPS, CHILD ABUSE, DRUG ABUSE, FAMILY LAW, CAPTA, ASFA, TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS, TPR, MOTHERHOODThings are different from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.This case is not relevant to Ontario.In Ontario, two types of Crown Wardship Orders can be made - without accessfor the purpose of adoption, and with access if adoption is not beingconsidered - often for older children.Where an order for Crown Wardship is made, and the child is not adopted, anatural parent can make an aapplication to have access, or to have the CrownWardship order terminated and the child returned, where there has been amaterial change in circumstannces since the making of the last order, andthe change would be in the best interests of the child.As always this is general advice, and follow up with a lawyer is alwaysrecommended.Doug ThomasWelland, Ontario