On 10 Apr 2004 12:18:26 -0700, sarallewellyn@gosympatico.ca (Rhiannon)
wrote:
I've read the excepts from the website, and found them disturbing.The book sounds quite pernicious.

When the birthmom (Cindy) read the book she said she realized that she
did not actually have a relationship with the potential aparents.

It was a con.

Jackie

Jackie <forgetit@me.com> wrote in message news:<dgvg70dlhu0u8c26vv6s79phriibf0tku2@4ax.com>... On 10 Apr 2004 12:18:26 -0700, sarallewellyn@gosympatico.ca (Rhiannon) wrote:I've read the excepts from the website, and found them disturbing.The book sounds quite pernicious. When the birthmom (Cindy) read the book she said she realized that she did not actually have a relationship with the potential aparents. It was a con. Jackie


Don't tell Rh that, Jackie. She can't face the truth about certain adopters.

patrice068@optusnet.com.au (Dian) wrote in message news:<9a095db9.0404110447.74562b99@posting.google.com>... Jackie <forgetit@me.com> wrote in message news:<dgvg70dlhu0u8c26vv6s79phriibf0tku2@4ax.com>... On 10 Apr 2004 12:18:26 -0700, sarallewellyn@gosympatico.ca (Rhiannon) wrote:I've read the excepts from the website, and found them disturbing.The book sounds quite pernicious. When the birthmom (Cindy) read the book she said she realized that she did not actually have a relationship with the potential aparents. It was a con. Jackie Don't tell Rh that, Jackie. She can't face the truth about certain adopters.


Careful of those adjectives.
D'you mean 'certain' or 'typical'?

Make up your mind, because it makes a difference - though not to the
fact that I've no problem whatsover recognising that some people,
adopters or otherwise, are dishonest, manipulative and indifferent.

If I thought the woman who wrote this book was such hot ****, why do
you think I'd describe her book as 'pernicious'? And why would I have
written to the publishers and e-mailed 20/20 to say as much.

You're going to have to try a lttle harder.


Rh.

Di writes:
Don't tell Rh that, Jackie. She can't face the truth about certain adopters.>>

Shouldn't that be "all adopters"?


P2P